[1]李胜楠,侯红航,肖佳苧.交易所年报问询函如何影响市场反应?——基于天齐锂业的案例研究[J].金融教育研究,2023,(03):3-15.
　LI Shengnan,HOU Honghang,XIAO Jianing.How do Exchange Annual Report Inquiry Letters Affect Market Reaction?——Case Study based on Tianqi Lithium[J].,2023,(03):3-15.
点击复制

交易所年报问询函如何影响市场反应?——基于天齐锂业的案例研究()
分享到：

《金融教育研究》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2023年03期
页码:
3-15
栏目:
金融论坛
出版日期:
2023-05-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
How do Exchange Annual Report Inquiry Letters Affect Market Reaction?——Case Study based on Tianqi Lithium
文章编号:
2095-0098(2023)03-0003-13
作者:
李胜楠;  侯红航;  肖佳苧
(天津大学 管理与经济学部,天津 300072)
Author(s):
LI Shengnan;  HOU Honghang;  XIAO Jianing
(College of Management and Economics,Tianjin University,Tianjin 300072,China)
关键词:
天齐锂业;  年报问询函;  市场反应
Keywords:
Tianqi Lithium;  Annual report inquiry letter;  Market reaction
分类号:
F832; F426
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
年报问询函作为一种事后监管的手段,近年来备受关注。基于信息传递机制和媒体关注机制,构建了年报问询函引起市场反应的理论框架。以天齐锂业为案例研究对象,发现天齐锂业通过传递“直观增量信息”“非直观增量信息”以及引发媒体关注等路径影响市场反应,市场通过产生相应的市场反应认可了年报问询函的监管职能。通过与赣锋锂业对比发现,当问询内容较多且涉及经营情况、问询力度较大、感情色彩更消极时,引发的负面市场反应更大,且二次延期回复会进一步降低累计超额收益率。结合特定行业、特定公司案例的研究,刻画年报问询函引发的市场反应和作用路径,对企业深刻理解问询函影响市场反应的机制,以及监管部门优化问询函监管作用具有启示意义。
Abstract:
As a means of ex post supervision,the annual report inquiry letter has received increasing attention in recent years.Based on the mechanism of information transmission and mechanism of media attention,this paper builds a theoretical framework for the market reaction caused by the annual report inquiry letter.Take Tianqi Lithium as the case study object,it is found that Tianqi Lithium influences the market response by delivering “intuitive incremental information”,“non-intuitive incremental information” and arousing media attention.The market recognized the regulatory function of the annual report inquiry letter by generating corresponding market reactions.By comparison with Ganfeng Lithium,it is found that when the query content is more related to the business situation,the query is more powerful and the emotional color is more negative,the negative market reaction is larger,and the second delay of reply will further reduce the cumulative excess return rate.Combining with the case studies of specific industries and specific companies,the detailed description of the market reaction and action path triggered by the annual report inquiry letter has enlightening significance for enterprises to deeply understand the mechanism of the inquiry letter affecting the market response,as well as the regulatory departments to optimize the regulatory role of the inquiry letter.

参考文献/References:

[1]王艳艳,何如桢,于李胜,等.管理层能力与年报柔性监管——基于年报问询函收函和回函视角的研究[J].会计研究,2020(12):59-70.
[2]Leuz C.,Wysocki P.D..The Economics of Disclosure and Financial Reporting Regulation:Evidence and Suggestions for Future Research[J].Journal of Accounting Research,2016(2):525-622.
[3]陈运森,邓祎璐,李哲.非处罚性监管具有信息含量吗?——基于问询函的证据[J].金融研究,2018(4):155-171.
[4]余明桂,卞诗卉.高质量的内部控制能否减少监管问询?——来自交易所年报问询函的证据[J].中南大学学报(社会科学版),2020(1):22-31.
[5]Heesea J.,Khan M.,Ramanna K..Is the SEC Captured?Evidence from Comment-Letter Reviews[J].Journal of Accounting and Economics,2017(1):98-122.
[6]Chen Y.,Y.Deng Y,Jin H.L.,et al.Political Connection and Regulatory Scrutiny through Comment Letters:Evidence from China[J].International Review of Finance,2018(3):789-798.
[7]孙彤,薛爽.管理层自利行为与外部监督——基于信息披露的信号博弈[J].中国管理科学,2019(2):187-196.
[8]梅蓓蕾,郭雪寒,叶建芳.问询函的溢出效应——基于盈余管理视角[J].会计研究,2021(6):30-41.
[9]Cunningham L.M.,Johnson B.A.,Johnson E.S.,et al.The Switch Up:An Examination of Changes in Earnings Management after Receiving SEC Comment Letters[J].Contemporary Accounting Research,Forthcoming,2019.
[10]Bozanic Z.,Dietricha J.R.,Johnson B.A..SEC Comment Letters and Firm Disclosure[J].Journal of Accounting and Public Policy,2017(5):337-357.
[11]李晓溪,饶品贵,岳衡.年报问询函与管理层业绩预告[J].管理世界,2019(8):173-188.
[12]Duro M.,Heese J.,Ormazabal G..The Effect of Enforcement Transparency:Evidence from SEC Comment-letter Reviews[J].Review of Accounting Studies,2019(3):780-823.
[13]Ballestero R.,Schmidt J.J..Does Auditor Involvement Expedite SEC Comment Letter Resolution?[R].Working Paper,2019.
[14]胡宁,曹雅楠,周楠,等.监管信息披露与债权人定价决策——基于沪深交易所年报问询函的证据[J].会计研究,2020(3):54-65.
[15]Cassell C.A.,Dreher L.M.,Myers L.A..Reviewing the SEC's Review Process:10-K Comment Letters and the Cost of Remediation[J].The Accounting Review,2013(6):1875-1908.
[16]Kubick T.R.,Lynch D.P.,Mayberry M.A.,et al.The Effects of Regulatory Scrutiny on Tax Avoidance:An Examination of SEC Comment Letters[J].The Accounting Review,2016(6):1751-1780.
[17]Nam J.,Thompson R..Does Financial Statement Comparability Facilitate SEC Oversight?[R].Working Paper,2019.
[18]Ryans J.P.Textual Classification of SEC Comment Letters[J].Review of Accounting Studies,2021(1):37-80.
[19]Gietzmann M.,Marra A.,Pettinicchio A..Comment Letter Frequency and CFO Turnover:A Dynamic Survival Analysis[J].Journal of Accounting,Auditing and Finance,2016(1):79-99.
[20]范合君,王思雨.财务报告问询函对年报文本语调的影响——基于沪深A股上市公司的经验数据[J].河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2022(1):74-81.
[21]杨海波,李建勇.问询监管的市场反应——基于深交所数据的实证分析[J].北京工商大学学报(社会科学版),2018(2):84-93.
[22]万明,宋清华.证券交易所公开谴责效率的实证分析——基于深、沪交易所比较的视角[J].投资研究,2012(3):125-138.
[23]Dechow P.,Lawrence A.,Ryans J..SEC Comment Letters and Insider Sales[J].The Accounting Review,2016(91):401-439.
[24]郭飞,周泳彤.交易所年报问询函具有信息含量吗?[J].证券市场导报,2018(7):20-28.
[25]胡玮佳,张开元.投资者关注与年报问询函市场反应——价格压力还是信息传递[J].经济管理,2019(10):162-177.
[26]Gietzmann M.B.,Pettinicchio A.K..External Auditor Reassessment of Client Business Risk Following the Issuance of a Comment Letter by the SEC[J].European Accounting Review,2014(1):57-85.
[27]沈萍,景瑞.年报问询函、审计定价与审计延迟[J].南京审计大学学报,2020(2):1-10.
[28]米莉,黄婧,何丽娜.证券交易所非处罚性监管会影响审计师定价决策吗?——基于问询函的经验证据[J].审计与经济研究,2019(4):57-65.
[29]胡定杰,谢军.非处罚性监管、审计师辞聘及后任审计师行为——基于年报问询函证据的分析[J].南京审计大学学报,2021(4):41-50.
[30]聂萍,潘再珍.问询函监管与大股东“掏空”——来自沪深交易所年报问询的证据[J].审计与经济研究,2019(3):91-103.
[31]李琳,张敦力,夏鹏.年报监管、内部人减持与市场反应——基于深交所年报问询函的研究[J].当代财经,2017(12):108-119.
[32]饶育蕾,彭叠峰,成大超.媒体注意力会引起股票的异常收益吗?——来自中国股票市场的经验证据[J].系统工程理论与实践,2010(2):287-297.
[33]肖奇,屈文洲.投资者关注、资产定价与股价同步性研究综述[J].外国经济与管理,2017(11):120-137.
[34]Malmendier U.,Tate G..Superstar CEOs[J].The Quarterly Journal of Economics,2009(4):1593-1638.
[35]张继德,廖微,张荣武.普通投资者关注对股市交易的量价影响——基于百度指数的实证研究[J].会计研究,2014(8):52-59.
[36]逯东,付鹏,杨丹.媒体类型、媒体关注与上市公司内部控制质量[J].会计研究,2015(4):78-85.
[37]Fang L.,Peress J.Media Coverage and the Cross-section of Stock Returns[J].The Journal of Finance,2009(5):2023-2052.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2022-09-15
基金项目:国家社会科学基金项目“非国有股东治理积极主义行为与混改国企的风险承担”(21BGL113)
作者简介:李胜楠(1976—),女,山东菏泽人,博士,副教授,研究方向为公司财务行为与资本市场; 肖佳苧(通信作者)。
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-05-25