[1]胡春阳,张文佳,刘晓艳.“后MOOC时代”SPOC混合式教学模式研究:教学效果及实践探索[J].金融教育研究,2022,(01):71-80.
 HU Chunyang,ZHANG Wenjia,LIU Xiaoyan.The Research on SPOC Blended Teaching Mode in Post-MOOC Era:Teaching Effect and Practical Exploration——Analysis of Ordered Multi-category Logistic Model based on Satisfaction Survey[J].,2022,(01):71-80.
点击复制

“后MOOC时代”SPOC混合式教学模式研究:教学效果及实践探索()
分享到:

《金融教育研究》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2022年01期
页码:
71-80
栏目:
金融教育
出版日期:
2022-01-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Research on SPOC Blended Teaching Mode in Post-MOOC Era:Teaching Effect and Practical Exploration——Analysis of Ordered Multi-category Logistic Model based on Satisfaction Survey
文章编号:
2095-0098(2022)01-0071-10
作者:
胡春阳12 张文佳1 刘晓艳3
1.江西财经大学 江西经济发展与改革研究院,江西 南昌 330013; 2.南京大学 商学院,江苏 南京 210093; 3.安徽粮食经济技师学院 经济贸易系,安徽 蚌埠 233080
Author(s):
HU Chunyang12 ZHANG Wenjia1 LIU Xiaoyan3
1.Jiangxi Institute of Economic Development and Reform,Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics,Nanchang,Jiangxi 330013,China; 2.Business School,Nanjing University,Nanjing,Jiangsu210093,China; 3.Department of Economics and Trade,Anhui Grain Economics Technician College,Bengbu,Anhui 233080,China
关键词:
混合式教学 SPOC 教学效果 满意度 Logistic模型
Keywords:
Blended teaching SPOC Teaching effect Satisfaction Logistic model
分类号:
G47
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
进入“后MOOC时代”,实施SPOC混合式教学有其必然性,分析其教学效果及影响因素有助于探索新型教学模式。利用CiteSpace词频和共现知识图谱分析,明确混合式教学模式的研究现状及研究内容,在此基础上归纳混合式教学影响因素的维度并构建教学效果有序多分类Logistic模型,结合调查数据分析线上教学资源质量、系统平台质量、教师教学能力、课程考核科学性及学生个体特征对教学效果满意度的影响。研究表明:首先是线上视频资源的清晰度、教学组织的有效性、课程教学的技巧性、课程考核的科学性和核心系统平台对教学效果具有显著影响,其次是系统平台的适用性,而其他变量的影响不显著。综合理论分析和实证结果讨论,尝试构建基于SPOC的融合化OMO教学模式,并围绕教育信息基础设施、SPOC课程资源、教师教育培训、课程考核体系和线上线下融合等实践进行了探讨。
Abstract:
It is inevitable to carry out SPOC blended teaching in the post MOOC era,and the analysis of its teaching effect and influencing factors is helpful to explore new teaching mode.This paper clarifies the research status and content of blended teaching mode through the CiteSpace keyword analysis of frequency and the co-occurrence knowledge map,based on which to summarize the dimensions of the influencing factors of blended teaching and construct an orderly multi-category Logistic model of teaching effect,and then analyzes the impact on the satisfaction of teaching results such as online teaching resources quality,online platform quality,teaching ability,course assessment and the students' individual characteristics using the survey data.The results show that these variables have a significant impact on teaching effects such as the clarity of online video resources,the effectiveness of teaching organization,the skills of course teaching,the scientific nature of course assessment and the core system platform,then is the applicability of the system platform,while the influence of other variables is not significant.Comprehensive theoretical analysis and empirical discussion,this paper attempts to construct an integrated OMO teaching model based on SPOC,and it also discusses the practice of educational information infrastructure,curriculum resources of SPOC,teacher education and training,curriculum evaluation systems,and online and offline integration.

参考文献/References:

[1]王晓,王志权.慕课背景下中国高校教学模式研究[J].国家教育行政学院学报,2015(10):41-45.
[2]谭永平.混合式教学模式的基本特征及实施策略[J].中国职业技术教育,2018(32):5-9.
[3]Voci E.,Young K.Blended Learning Working in a Leadership Development Programme[J].Industrial and Commercial Training,2001(5):157-161.
[4]刘涛.“翻转+直播+实训”:新闻传播学类课程的混合式教学模式探索[J].新闻与写作,2020(9):78-84.
[5]张静,姚建欣,丁林.学习进阶视角下混合式教学模式的构建与实验——以“大学物理”课程为例[J].现代教育技术,2020(10):65-70.
[6]邢丽丽.基于精准教学的混合式教学模式构建与实证研究[J].中国电化教育,2020(9):135-141.
[7]关鑫.“公众普惠”到“私人定制”——MOOC到SPOC发展研究[J].高校图书馆工作,2015(1):19-21.
[8]曾明星,李桂平,周清平,等.从MOOC到SPOC:一种深度学习模式建构[J].中国电化教育,2015(11):28-34+53.
[9]贺斌,曹阳.SPOC:基于MOOC的教学流程创新[J].中国电化教育,2015(3):22-29.
[10]陈平雁,黄浙明.SPSS10.0统计软件高级应用教程[M].北京:人民军医大学出版社,2004.
[11]田媛,许月卿,郭洪峰,等.基于多分类Logistic回归模型的张家口市农用地格局模拟[J].资源科学,2012(8):1493-1499.
[12]Brown J.B.An Analysis of Student Satisfaction at the Community College of Baltimore County,Catonsville[D].Delaware:Wilmington College,2005.
[13]Shah F.T.Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction in higher education in Pakistan[J].Journal of Quality and Technology Management,1996(2):73-89.
[14]曾明星,李桂平,周清平,等.从MOOC到SPOC:一种深度学习模式建构[J].中国电化教育,2015(11):28-34+53.
[15]万建香,封福育,齐亚伟,等.《计量经济学》SPOC运行与课堂翻转[J].金融教育研究,2019(4):75-80.
[16]张金玲.基于SPOC模式的高校文科计算机基础课程教学有效性提升路径分析[J].中国远程教育,2016(5):71-75.
[17]刘威童,汪潇潇.混合式教学满意度影响因素研究[J].现代教育技术,2019(1):108-114.
[18]蒋志辉,赵呈领,李红霞,等.在线学习者满意度影响因素:直播情境与录播情境比较[J].开放教育研究,2017(4):76-85.
[19]Richardson J.T.Investigating the Relationship between Variations in Students' Perceptions of Their Academic Environment and Variations in study behavior in distance education[J].British Journal of Educational Psychology,2006(4):867-893.
[20]吴九占,郭宇.基于SPOC的思想政治理论课“翻转课堂”教学效果的多维分析[J].思想理论教育导刊,2018(8):110-115.
[21]袁嫄.基于SPOC的行为金融学深度学习模式研究[J].金融教育研究,2019(1):69-75.
[22]关鑫.“公众普惠”到“私人定制”——MOOC到SPOC发展研究[J].高校图书馆工作,2015(1):19-21.
[23]罗恒,冯秦娜,陈莹,等.“战疫”期间中小学在线教学平台与工具调研[J].现代教育技术,2020(7):113-119.
[24]李红美,陆国栋,张剑平.后 MOOC 时期高等学校教学新模式探索[J].高等工程教育研究,2014(6):58-67.
[25]王芳.基于分层线性模型的大学生教学满意度影响因素分析[J].复旦教育论坛,2018(1):48-55+97.
[26]罗恒,冯秦娜,陈莹,等.“战疫”期间中小学在线教学平台与工具调研[J].现代教育技术,2020(7):113-119.
[27]Hsu Y.S.The Development of Teachers' Professional Learning and Knowledge[A].Development of Science Teachers' TPACK:East Asian Practices[C].Singapore:Springer,2015:11.

相似文献/References:

[1]袁 嫄.基于SPOC的行为金融学深度学习模式研究[J].金融教育研究,2019,(01):69.
 YUAN Yuan.Research on Deep Learning Mode of Behavioral Finance Based on SPOC[J].,2019,(01):69.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2021-08-18
基金项目:安徽省职业与成人教育学会教育科研规划项目(AZZ1802)
作者简介:胡春阳(1979—),男,江西进贤人,在站博士后,研究方向为电化教育、产业经济学; 刘晓艳(通信作者)。
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-01-25