[1]曾文海,王 晨,谯 清,等.城市群包容性绿色增长测度、差异分解及收敛性研究——以长三角与珠三角城市群为例[J].金融教育研究,2022,(01):57-70.
　ZENG Wenhai,WANG Chen,QIAO Qing,et al.Research on the Measurement,Difference Decomposition and Convergence of Inclusive Green Growth in Urban Clusters——A Case of the Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta[J].,2022,(01):57-70.
点击复制

城市群包容性绿色增长测度、差异分解及收敛性研究——以长三角与珠三角城市群为例()
分享到：

《金融教育研究》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2022年01期
页码:
57-70
栏目:
管理决策
出版日期:
2022-01-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on the Measurement,Difference Decomposition and Convergence of Inclusive Green Growth in Urban Clusters——A Case of the Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta
文章编号:
2095-0098(2022)01-0057-14
作者:
曾文海;  王 晨;  谯 清;  刘章生
江西师范大学 城市建设学院,江西 南昌 330022
Author(s):
ZENG Wenhai;  WANG Chen;  QIAO Qing;  LIU Zhangsheng
College of City Construction,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang,Jiangxi 330022,China
关键词:
城市群;  包容性绿色增长;  差异分解;  收敛
Keywords:
Urban clusters;  Inclusive green growth;  Difference decomposition;  Convergence
分类号:
F124.1
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
基于2004—2017年地级及以上城市面板数据,运用定基极差熵权法、Kernel密度估计方法、Dagum基尼系数分析长三角与珠三角包容性绿色增长水平的分布动态与区域差异,并利用收敛模型对其σ收敛、β收敛进行实证检验。研究表明:珠三角包容性绿色增长水平远高于长三角,两者均呈上升趋势,但长三角年均增速要高于珠三角。长三角与珠三角包容性绿色增长水平均不存在两极或多极分化趋势,区域内相对差异是其总体空间差异的主要来源。长三角与珠三角包容性绿色增长水平均存在σ收敛、绝对β收敛和条件β收敛,且长三角对珠三角存在明显的“追赶”态势。技术创新、政府干预和人力资本三大因素对城市群包容性绿色增长的收敛产生显著正向影响,对外开放与市场经济发展程度分别表现出污染避难所效应和消极结构效应。为提升长三角与珠三角及其它城市群的包容性绿色增长水平,应当积极提升技术创新水平、提高人力资本存量和优化人力资本结构。要推动外资利用方式由追求外资数量向注重外资质量转型,促进民营经济与国有经济协同发展,合理增加政府财政支出,提高政府财政支出效率和优化政府财政支出结构。
Abstract:
Based on the panel data of prefecture-level cities from 2004 to 2017,this paper uses the fixed base range entropy weight method,Kernel density estimation and Dagum Gini coefficient to analyze the distributional dynamic evolution and regional difference of the inclusive green growth level in the Yangtze River Delta and the Pearl River Delta,and further uses convergence model to test their σ convergence and β convergence.The results indicate that the inclusive green growth level of the Pearl River Delta is much higher than that of the Yangtze River Delta,both of which are on the rise,but the annual growth rate of the Yangtze River Delta is higher than that of the Pearl River Delta.The inclusive green growth level of the Yangtze River Delta and the Pearl River Delta has no polarization or multipolar differentiation trend,and the regional relative differences are the main sources of its overall spatial differences.The inclusive green growth level shows typical σ convergence and absolute β convergence and conditional β convergence in the Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta,and the Yangtze River Delta is obviously catching up with the Pearl River Delta.The technological innovation,government intervention and human capital have a significant positive effect on convergence of inclusive green growth of urban clusters,and the degree of opening to the outside world and the development of market economy show the effect of pollution shelter and negative structural effect respectively.In order to promote the inclusive green growth level of the Yangtze River Delta,Pearl River Delta and other urban clusters,strategies such as actively improving the level of technological innovation,increasing the stock of human capital and optimizing the structure of human capital should be taken.In addition,promoting the transformation of the utilization of foreign capital from pursuing the quantity of foreign capital to focusing on the quality of foreign capital,advancing the coordinated development of the private economy and the state-owned economy,reasonably increasing the government financial expenditure,improving the efficiency of government financial expenditure and optimizing the structure of government financial expenditure.

参考文献/References:

[1]周小亮,吴武林.中国包容性绿色增长的测度及分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2018(8):3-20.
[2]范正根,周洪兵,刘章生.国内经济增长质量研究热点及演化路径可视化分析[J].金融教育研究,2020(3):42-53.
[3]赵倩,沈坤荣.以城市群建设推动区域经济高质量发展研究[J].经济纵横,2018(9):92-98.
[4]梁红艳.中国城市群生产性服务业分布动态、差异分解与收敛性[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2018(12):40-60.
[5]魏巍.长三角、珠三角经济发展格局研究——基于要素生产率三重分解的视角[J].技术经济与管理研究,2017(4):111-115.
[6]祝丽云,李彤,马丽岩,等.雾霾约束下我国城市绿色经济效率评价研究——以京津冀、长三角和珠三角城市圈为例[J].科技管理研究,2018(22):58-63.
[7]World Bank.Inclusive Green Growth:The Pathway to Sustainable Development[M].Washington,DC:World Bank Publications,2012.
[8]Bouma J.,Berkhout E.Inclusive Green Growth[R].PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency,2015:1708.
[9]张晓颖.经济、环境、社会发展与人:从可持续发展观到包容性绿色增长[J].江淮论坛,2014(6):93-98+61.
[10]周小亮,吴武林,廖达颖.我国区域包容性绿色增长测度与差异研究[J].科技进步与对策,2018(6):42-49.
[11]邵娜娜,张红霞.以包容性绿色发展推动构建人类命运共同体[J].广西社会科学,2019(12):48-53.
[12]杨雪星.包容性绿色经济增长指数构建与实证研究——基于G20国家数据[J].福建论坛(人文社会科学版),2014(6):42-48.
[13]吴武林,周小亮.中国包容性绿色增长测算评价与影响因素研究[J].社会科学研究,2018(1):27-37.
[14]王宇昕,余兴厚,黄玲.长江经济带包容性绿色增长的测度与区域差异分析[J].贵州财经大学学报,2019(3):89-98.
[15]李政大,刘坤.中国绿色包容性发展图谱及影响机制分析[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2018(1):48-59.
[16]Sun Y.H.,Ding W.W.,Yang Z.Y.,et al.Measuring China's regional inclusive green growth[J].Science of the Total Environment,2020(1):1-10.
[17]Chen G.N.,Yang Z.H.,Chen S.H.Measurement and Convergence Analysis of Inclusive Green Growth in the Yangtze River Economic Belt Cities[J].Sustainability,2020(3):1-17
[18]王宇昕,余兴厚,黄玲.长江经济带市域包容性绿色增长的空间格局分布与演变特征[J].技术经济,2019(6):80-89.
[19]吴武林,周小亮.中国包容性绿色增长绩效评价体系的构建及应用[J].中国管理科学,2019(9):183-194.
[20]Dagum C.A New Approach to the Decomposition of the Gini Income Inequality Ratio[J].Empirical Economics,1997(4):515-531.
[21]寇宗来,刘学悦.中国城市和产业创新力报告2017[R].复旦大学产业发展研究中心,2017.
[22]李敏杰,王健.外商直接投资质量与中国绿色全要素生产率增长[J].软科学,2019(9):13-20.
[23]王贺,李忠红.我国发达地区对大学生就业吸引力的测度及其启示——基于珠三角和长三角25个城市数据的比较[J].江西社会科学,2016(9):44-49.

相似文献/References:

[1]魏国恩.岳九咸小三角制造业分工与专业化合作研究[J].金融教育研究,2017,(04):50.
　WEI Guoen.Study on the Manufacturing Division of Labor and Specialization Cooperation in Yue-Jiu-Xian Small Triangle[J].,2017,(01):50.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2020-10-16
基金项目:江西省社会科学规划项目“人口老龄化对住宅能耗影响的机理与对策研究”(19GL08); 国家自然科学基金项目“环境规制对绿色技术创新的作用机理与政策模拟研究——以长江经济带为例”(71863020); 江西省高校人文社会科学研究规划项目“环境规制影响绿色经济增长的机理与对策研究——以长江经济带为例”(GL18125)
作者简介:曾文海(1975—),男,江西永新人,副教授,研究方向为绿色发展与建筑节能。
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-01-25