[1]刘荣春a,刘土英,李文婷b.中国与东盟四国旅游服务贸易国际竞争性与互补性研究[J].金融教育研究,2020,(06):56-67.
　LIU Rongchuna,LIU Tuyin,LI Wentingb.Service Trade between China and the Four ASEAN Countries[J].,2020,(06):56-67.
点击复制

中国与东盟四国旅游服务贸易国际竞争性与互补性研究()
分享到：

《金融教育研究》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2020年06期
页码:
56-67
栏目:
管理决策
出版日期:
2020-12-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Service Trade between China and the Four ASEAN Countries
文章编号:
2095-0098(2020)06-0056-12
作者:
刘荣春1a;  刘土英2;  李文婷1b
1.江西师范大学 a.商学院 b.区域创新与创业研究中心,江西 南昌 330022; 2.江西旅游商贸职业学院,江西 南昌 330100
Author(s):
LIU Rongchun1a;  LIU Tuyin2;  LI Wenting1b
1a.School of Business,1b.Regional Innovation and Entrepreneurship Research Center, Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang,Jiangxi 330022,China; 2.Jiangxi Tourism&Commerce Vocational College,Nanchang,Jiangxi 330100,China
关键词:
旅游服务贸易;  贸易竞争力指数;  贸易互补性指数
Keywords:
Tourism Service Trade;  Trade Competitiveness Index;  Trade Complementarity Index
分类号:
F750
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
从旅游服务贸易总额、出入境游客人数来分析中国与新加坡、泰国、马来西亚、菲律宾(简称东盟四国)的旅游服务贸易现状,通过IMS指数、TC指数、RCA指数三大旅游服务贸易竞争力指数来测度中国与东盟四国的旅游服务贸易竞争力水平,以及利用TCI指数来测度中国与东盟四国之间的旅游服务贸易互补性。结果表明:中泰两国的旅游服务贸易结构不合理,泰国的旅游服务贸易竞争力水平最高,新加坡、马来西亚在旅游服务贸易领域表现较好,马来西亚竞争力水平比菲律宾要高,中国竞争力水平略高于新加坡,新加坡的竞争力水平最弱; 此外,中国与东盟四国之间存在旅游服务贸易互补性。因此要促进我国旅游服务贸易结构改革,加强中国与东盟四国之间的旅游服务贸易合作。
Abstract:
This article analyzes the current situation of the tourism service trade between China and Singapore,Thailand,Malaysia,and the Philippines(Four ASEAN countries)from the total tourism service trade and the number of inbound and outbound tourists.The three major tourism services are IMS index,TC index and RCA index.The trade competitiveness index is used to measure the competitiveness of China and the four ASEAN countries in tourism service trade,and the TCI index is used to measure the complementarity of the tourism service trade between China and the four ASEAN countries.The results show that the structure of tourism service trade between China and Thailand is unreasonable,Thailand has the highest level of competitiveness in tourism service trade,Singapore and Malaysia perform well in the field of tourism service trade,Malaysia's competitiveness is higher than the Philippines,and China's competitiveness.Slightly higher than Singapore,Singapore has the weakest level of competitiveness; in addition,there is complementarity in tourism service trade between China and the four ASEAN countries.Therefore,it is necessary to promote the reform of tourism service trade structure and strengthen the tourism service trade cooperation between China and the four ASEAN countries.

参考文献/References:

[1]Yoon Y,Uysal M.An examination of the effects of motivation and satisfaction on destination loyalty:a structural model[J].Tourism Management,2005(1):45-56.
[2]Croes R,Kubickova M.From potential to ability to compete:Towards a performance-based tourism competitiveness index[J].Journal of Destination Marketing & Management,2013,2(3):146-154.
[3]李志伟,赵志峰.中国旅游服务贸易国际竞争力影响因素实证研究——基于灰色关联度模型[J].商业经济研究,2018(16):139-141.
[4]赵若锦.中国与“一带一路”沿线国家旅游服务贸易互补性研究[J].价格月刊,2018(12):36-41.
[5]庞德良,华景斌.基于商品和服务贸易全视角的中日韩贸易竞争与互补分析[J].社会科学战线,2019(2):43-53.
[6]李志伟,赵志峰,陈才.中国旅游服务贸易国际竞争力指数比较——基于进出口数据的实证分析[J].价格月刊,2018(8):28-32.
[7]耿献辉,张武超.我国旅游服务贸易国际竞争力及其影响因素分析[J].价格月刊,2018(10):39-46.
[8]王凤娇.金砖五国服务贸易竞争性与互补性分析[D].吉林财经大学,2019.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2020-07-30
基金项目:教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目“贸易政策不确定性对中国企业出口行为的影响研究:出口质量与价格加成”(19YJC790202)
作者简介:刘荣春(1962-),男,江西南昌人,教授,研究方向为国际贸易。
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-12-20