[1]曹兰芳,文建林.高校异质性教师教学与科研工作的投入研究[J].金融教育研究,2019,(04):69-74.
　CAO Lanfang,WEN Jianlin.Research on the Input of Heterogeneous Teachers in Teaching and Scientific Research in Colleges and Universities[J].,2019,(04):69-74.
点击复制

高校异质性教师教学与科研工作的投入研究()
分享到：

《金融教育研究》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2019年04期
页码:
69-74
栏目:
金融教育
出版日期:
2019-08-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on the Input of Heterogeneous Teachers in Teaching and Scientific Research in Colleges and Universities
文章编号:
2095-0098(2019)04-0069-06
作者:
曹兰芳;  文建林
中南林业科技大学 商学院,湖南 长沙 410018
Author(s):
CAO Lanfang;  WEN Jianlin
School of Business,Central South University of Forestry and Technology,Changsha,Hunan 410018,China
关键词:
高校教师;  教学;  科研;  工作意愿;  关系认知;  工作投入;  内在动机
Keywords:
college teachers;  teaching;  scientific research;  work intention;  relationship cognition;  work engagement;  intrinsic motivation
分类号:
G640
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
以高校三类异质性教师,即教学为主型教师、科研为主型教师、教学科研型教师为研究对象,从教师对待教学与科研工作的工作意愿、关系认知、工作投入及内在动机等方面进行测量和比较。研究结果显示:高校三类异质性教师均有意愿、有侧重地从事教学和科研工作; 多数教师认为教学与科研工作具有互相促进作用; 三类教师都表现出较高的工作投入程度和较强的内在工作动机,三类教师工作投入测量总均值关系为:3.83(科研为主型教师)>3.76(教学科研型教师)>3.55(教学为主型教师)。
Abstract:
This study takes three kinds of heterogeneous teachers as the research object,including teaching teachers,scientific research teachers,teaching and research teachers.Measures and compares the work intention,relationship cognition,work engagement,intrinsic motivation of three kinds of heterogeneous teachers.The research results show:1)Three types of heterogeneous teachers in colleges and universities have the willingness and focus on teaching and research work.2)Most teachers believe that teaching and research work can promote each other.3)Three types of teachers have shown a high level of work engagement and intrinsic motivation,the relationship between the mean of the three types of teachers' work input measurement is:3.83(research teachers)>3.76(teaching and research teachers)>3.55(teaching teachers).

参考文献/References:

[1]约翰·亨利·纽曼.大学的理念[M].高师宁,何克勇,何可人,译.贵阳:贵州教育出版社,2003.
[2]罗纳德·巴尼特.高等教育理念[M].蓝劲松,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2012.
[3]周川.从洪堡到博耶:高校科研观的转变[J].教育研究,2005(6):26-30.
[4]李永刚.高校教学与科研结合的政策困局与破解路径[J].教师教育学报,2017,4(4):84-92.
[5]吴伟伟.高等学校教师流动管制与师资配置效率[J].高教探索,2017(6):110-118.
[6]乔联宝.基于联合DEA模型的“985”高校科研-教学综合效率评价[J].科研管理,2015,36(1):210-215.
[7]徐国兴.我国本科教学质量提升策略探析[J].教育发展研究,2017(5):10-17.
[8]李锋亮,王云斌,何光喜.什么因素影响了大学教师的学术发表[J].教育发展研究,2016(11):14-20,45.
[9]Gravani M N.Unveiling professional learning:Shifting from the delivery of courses to an understandingof the processes[J].Teaching and Teacher Educa-tion,2007,23(5):688-704.
[10]王桢,陈乐妮,李旭培.变革型领导与工作投入:基于情感视角的调节中介模型[J].管理评论,2015(9):120-129; 212.
[11]曾垂凯.工作惬意感问卷的信度与效度[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2013,21(1):35-38.
[12]Jum C.Nunnally.Psychometric theory[M].New York:McGraw-Hill,1978.
[13]Schaufeli,W B,Salanova M,González-Romá V,A.B.Bakker.The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout:A Two SampleConfirmatory Factor Analytic Approach[J].Journal of Happiness Studies,2002,3(1):71-92.
[14]Bakker,A.B..The Work-related Flow Inventory:Construction and Initial Validation of the Wolf[J].Journal of Vocational Behavior,2008,72(3):400-414.

相似文献/References:

[1]陈 武,杨天南,陈建安.二元视角下的高校教师科技成果转化意愿研究[J].金融教育研究,2021,(03):56.
　CHEN Wu,YANG Tiannan,CHEN Jianan.A Study on the Willingness of University Teachers to Transform Scientific and Technological Achievements from a Dual Perspective[J].,2021,(04):56.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2018-12-13
基金项目:湖南省教育科学“十二五”规划课题“高校异质性教师教学与科研行为研究”(XJK015QGDO17)
作者简介:曹兰芳(1981-),女,湖南益阳人,博士,副教授,研究方向为高等教育管理。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-08-10