[1]潜 力.“双一流”建设下高校社会成本共担研究——中美大学教育基金会比较[J].金融教育研究,2019,(05):61-68.
 QIAN Li.AStudy on the Social Cost Sharing of Universities under the Construction of “Double First-Class”——Comparisons between Chinese and American University Education Foundations[J].,2019,(05):61-68.
点击复制

“双一流”建设下高校社会成本共担研究——中美大学教育基金会比较()
分享到:

《金融教育研究》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2019年05期
页码:
61-68
栏目:
出版日期:
2019-10-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
AStudy on the Social Cost Sharing of Universities under the Construction of “Double First-Class”——Comparisons between Chinese and American University Education Foundations
文章编号:
2095-0098(2019)05-0061-08
作者:
潜 力
江西财经大学 金融学院,江西 南昌 330013
Author(s):
QIAN Li
JiangXi University of Finance and Economics,Nanchang,Jiangxi 330013,China
关键词:
“双一流”建设 社会成本共担 高校教育基金会 投融资策略
Keywords:
“Double First-Class” construction Social Cost sharing University education foundation Investment and financing strategies
分类号:
G647
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
解决高校办学经费不足问题,离不开社会成本的共担。对比研究中美大学教育基金会在捐赠体系、管理模式、筹资结构和投资绩效等各方面的表现,发现我国高校教育基金会存在着体系不完善、管理不够专业、资产规模小、融资结构不合理、投资业绩弱、投入少、税收优惠不足等问题。这都严重阻碍了基金会内生动力的释放,抑制其对于“双一流”建设的支撑作用。因此,有必要借鉴美国一流高校的先进经验,并结合我国国情,完善我国大学教育基金会的管理体系,建立长效募捐激励机制,提升管理人员专业化水平,创新募捐模式,提升基金投资运作绩效,更好地为大学的“双一流”建设助力。
Abstract:
To solve the problem of insufficient funds for running higher education,we need to share social costs.This paper comparing the donation system,management mode,asset scale,financing structure,investment performance and operation cost of Chinese and American university education foundations,it is found that there are some problems in China’s university education foundations,such as imperfect system,unprofessional management,small asset scale,unreasonable financing structure,weak investment performance,low cost input and insufficient tax incentives.All these have seriously hindered the release of endogenous motivation of higher education foundations and restrained their supporting role in the construction of “Double First-Class”.Therefore,it is necessary to learn from the advanced experience of the top universities in the United States,and combining China’s national conditions,to improve the management system of China’s university education foundation.We will establish a long-term donation incentive mechanism,improve the professional level of management personnel,innovate the donation mode,and improve the performance of fund investment,so as to better facilitate the construction of “double first-class” universities.

参考文献/References:

[1]DB.约翰.斯通.高等教育财政:问题与出路[M].沈红 译.北京:人民教育出版社,2004:18-20.
[2]P.Bourdieu.Distinction:a social critique of the judgment of taste[M].Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1984.
[3]Stephen Knowles.Is social capital part of the institutions continuum and is it a deep determinant of development?[J].UNU-WIDER Research Paper,2006(25):25-26.
[4]Ingo Liefner.Funding,Resource Allocation,and PerformanceinHigher EducationSystems [J].Higher Education,2003,(4):28-30.
[5]王寰安,宁晔,王琰.大学筹资结构对办学绩效影响的实证研究—以美国全国性大学为例[J].教育与经济,2015,(2):44-56.
[6]李锋亮,王云斌.教育基金会的发展与世界一流大学建设[J].复旦教育论坛,2016,(3):19-25
[7]刘春生,王任达.发展大学捐赠基金会,促进大学教育捐赠[J].北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2005(21)4:8-11.
[8]伍尚海.高等教育基金会的发展探析[J].高教论坛,2010(8):128-129.
[9]苏洋,赵文华.中美一流大学教育基金会的比较与借鉴[J].高教探索,2016(3):53-57+74.
[10]赵亮,胡仁东.“双一流”建设背景下我国高校教育基金会发展的策略选择[J].重庆高教研究,2018(11):72-85.
[11]佟婧,燕凌,洪成文.耶鲁大学捐赠基金成功运作之道[J].高教探索,2012(3):47-51.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019-03-09基金项目:江西省教育规划项目“‘双一流’建设的社会成本分担机制研究”(18YB075)作者简介:潜 力(1973-),男,江西靖安人,博士,副教授,研究方向为金融理论。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-10-10