[1]李银秀.政府规模经济增长效应的GMM评价——市级面板数据[J].金融教育研究,2015,(06):59-63.
　LI Yinxiu.The GMM Evaluation of Government Scale Economic Growth Effect——At the Municipal Level Panel Data1[J].,2015,(06):59-63.
点击复制

政府规模经济增长效应的GMM评价——市级面板数据()
分享到：

《金融教育研究》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2015年06期
页码:
59-63
栏目:
出版日期:
2015-12-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
The GMM Evaluation of Government Scale Economic Growth Effect——At the Municipal Level Panel Data1
作者:
李银秀
中共陕西省委党校,陕西 西安 710061
Author(s):
LI Yinxiu
Shanxi Provincial Party Committee Party School,the Communist Party of China,Xi'an,Shanxi 710061,China
关键词:
政府规模;  经济增长效应评价;  市级面板数据;  GMM方法
Keywords:
government size;  effect evaluation of economic growth;  municipal level panel data;  GMM method
分类号:
F123.14
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
政府规模会通过对居民消费、就业和产业结构等宏观因素产生作用,直接影响经济增长,同时,又通过作用于经济增长基本要素产生间接影响。在实际经济运行中,这两种影响是同时存在不可分割的。文章基于市级面板数据,应用GMM方法对政府规模的经济增长效应进行动态评价,检验政府规模对经济增长的影响,结果发现政府规模的扩张对经济增长产生显著的负效应,为促进经济发展,必须缩减政府规模。
Abstract:
The government scale had effect on the macro factors such as consumer,employment and industrial structure,direct impact on economic growth,at the same time,it had indirect influence on the basic elements of economic growth.In real economic operation,the two effects exist at the same time and inseparable.Based on the municipal level panel data,using GMM method to evaluate dynamically the size of government economic growth effect,test the influence of government scale on economic growth,the results showed that the expansion of government scale significantly negative effects on economic growth,so we must reduce the size of government to promote the development of the economy.

参考文献/References:

[1]Ram,R.,Government Size and Economic Growth:A New Framework and some Evidence From Cross-Section and Time-Series Data[J].The American Economic Review,1986,76(1):191-203.
[2]Ram,R.,Government Size and Economic Growth:A New Framework and some Evidence From Cross-Section and Time-Series Data:Reply[J].The American Economic Review,1989,79(1):281-284.
[3]Karras,G.,On the Optimal Government Size in Europe:Theory and Empirical Evidence[J].The Manchester School,2002,65(3):280-294.
[4]Landau,D.,Government Expenditure and Economic Growth:A Cross-Country Study[J].Southern Economic Journal,1983,49(3):783-792.
[5]Grossman,P.J.,Government and Economic Growth:A Non-Linear Relationship[J].Public Choice,1988,56(2):193-200.
[6]Grossman,P.J.,Government and Growth:Cross-Sectional Evidence[J].Public Choice,1990,65(3):217-227.
[7]Borcherding,T.J.Ferris and A.Garzoni.Growth in the Real Size of Government Since 1970[Z].Carleton Economic Papers,2005:77-108.
[8]胡家勇.我国政府规模及干预的成本—收益分析[J].社会科学辑刊,1994(6):42-46.
[9]陈健,胡家勇.政府规模与经济发展[J].财经问题研究,2003(8):3-7.
[10]马拴友.政府规模与经济增长:兼论中国财政的最优规模[J].世界经济,2000(11):59-64.
[11]李建强,张淑翠.政府规模对经济增长的Amery曲线效应——基于我国省级面板数据的实证分析[J].山东经济,2011(6):37-42.
[12]杨子晖.政府规模、政府支出增长与经济增长关系的非线性研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2011(6):77-92.
[13]Arellano,M.and S.Bond,Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data:Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations[J].The review of economic studies,1991,58(2):277-297.
[14]Bond,S.R.,Dynamic Panel Data Models:A Guide to Micro Data Methods and Practice[Z].Institute for Fiscal Studies Cemmap working paper,2002:2-9.
[15]刘生龙,王亚华,胡鞍钢.西部大开发成效与中国区域经济收敛[J].经济研究,2009(9):14-23.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:国家自然科学基金面上项目“区域碳减排潜力调控机制与政策研究”(71373170)
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01