[1]樊士德,费振东.劳动力流动对欠发达地区农村家庭多维贫困的影响研究[J].金融教育研究,2021,(04):30-42.
 FAN Shide,FEI Zhendong.Study on the Impact of Labor Mobility on Multidimensional Poverty of Rural Families in Underdeveloped Areas[J].,2021,(04):30-42.
点击复制

劳动力流动对欠发达地区农村家庭多维贫困的影响研究()
分享到:

《金融教育研究》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2021年04期
页码:
30-42
栏目:
经济观察
出版日期:
2021-07-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on the Impact of Labor Mobility on Multidimensional Poverty of Rural Families in Underdeveloped Areas
文章编号:
2095-0098(2021)04-0030-13
作者:
樊士德 费振东
南京审计大学 经济学院,江苏 南京 211815
Author(s):
FAN Shide FEI Zhendong
School of Economics,Nanjing Audit University,Nanjing,Jiangsu 211815,China
关键词:
劳动力流动 多维贫困 减贫效应 Probit模型
Keywords:
Labor migration Multidimensional poverty Poverty reduction effects Probit model
分类号:
F061.3
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
建构多维贫困指标体系,以2012年和2014年中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS)数据为基础,利用“收入导向型”多维贫困指数方法测度了欠发达地区农村家庭的贫困状况,并采用随机效应Probit模型实证分析了劳动力外流对欠发达地区农村家庭多维贫困的内在影响。在此基础上比较了一维、二维、三维和四维等不同维度之间的差异化影响,还进一步考察了劳动力流动微观决策的变化(持续外出务工、由外出务工到不外出务工、由不外出务工到外出务工)对农村家庭贫困状态变动(脱贫、未脱贫、返贫、未返贫)的动态影响。结果表明:劳动力流动能够有效降低欠发达地区农村家庭收入贫困及多维贫困发生的概率; 男性外出务工人员人数相比女性对缓解多维贫困的边际贡献更高,选择跨省务工的减贫效应更为显著,然而随着贫困维度的增加,劳动力流动对贫困的边际效应呈现逐渐减弱特征。此外,持续外出务工不仅可以有效提高欠发达地区农村家庭单维和多维的脱贫概率,而且能够降低农村家庭重返贫困的可能性; 由非外出务工向外出务工的微观决策转变也有助于缓解贫困,不过其边际贡献低于持续外出务工的家庭。户主特征、家庭特征中的不同控制变量对农村家庭多维贫困存在差异化的内在影响。
Abstract:
Based on the 2012 and 2014 Chinese Household Tracking Survey(CFPS)data,a multidimensional poverty index system was constructed to measure the poverty status of rural families in underdeveloped areas using the “income-oriented” multidimensional poverty index method.In addition,stochastic effect Probit model is used to empirically analyze the internal influence of labor outflow on multi-dimensional poverty of rural families in underdeveloped areas.Based on the comparison of the one dimensional,two dimensional,three and four dimensions such as the differentiation between different dimensions,further investigates the change of the labor mobility micro decision-making(continuous out-migrating for work,from out-migrating for work to not out-migrating for work,from not out-migrating for work to out-migrating for work)to the countryside family poverty change(out of poverty,not out of poverty,back to poverty,not back to poverty)dynamic effect.The results show that labor mobility can effectively reduce the probability of rural family income poverty and multidimensional poverty in underdeveloped areas; compared with women,the number of male migrant workers has a higher marginal contribution to alleviating multidimensional poverty,and the poverty reduction effect of choosing trans-provincial migrant workers is more significant; however,with the increase of poverty dimension,the marginal effect of labor mobility on poverty is gradually weakened.In addition,continuous migrant work can not only effectively improve the probability of single and multi-dimensional poverty alleviation of rural families in less developed areas,but also reduce the possibility of rural families returning to poverty; the micro decision to shift from non-migrant workers to migrant workers also helps to alleviate poverty,but its marginal contribution is lower than that of households that continue to migrate.Different control variables in the characteristics of household head and family have different internal effects on the multidimensional poverty of rural families.

参考文献/References:

[1]Acosta,Pablo,Calderon,C,Fajnzylber,P.What is the Impact of International Remitt-ances on Poverty and Inequality in Latin America[J].World Development,2008(1):89-114.
[2]Lokshin,Michael,Bontch-Osmolovski,M,Glinskaya,E.Work-Related Migration and Poverty Reduction in Nepal[J].Review of Development Economics,2010(2):323-332.
[3]Adams,Richard H.,Page J.Do International Migration,Remittance Reduce Poverty in Development Countries[J].World Development,1995(10):1645-1669.
[4]Brown,Richard P.C.,Jimenez,E.Estimating the Net Effects of Migration and Remittances on Poverty and Inequality:Comparison of Fiji and Tonga[J].Journal of International Development,2008(4):547-571.
[5]柳建平,张永丽.劳动力流动对贫困地区农村经济的影响——基于甘肃10个贫困村调查资料的分析[J].中国农村观察,2009(3):63-74.
[6]蒲艳萍,李霞.劳动力流动对农村经济的影响效应——基于对四川省调查数据的分析[J].人口与经济,2011(1):39-45.
[7]王金营,李竞博.连片贫困地区农村家庭贫困测度及其致贫原因分析——以燕山—太行山和黑龙港地区为例[J].中国人口科学,2011(4):2-13.
[8]韩佳丽,王志章,王汉杰.新形势下贫困地区农村劳动力流动的减贫效应研究——基于连片特困地区的经验分析[J].人口学刊,2018(5):100-113.
[9]樊士德,朱克朋.农村劳动力流动、务工收入与家庭贫困——基于东部欠发达县域878户农户的实证研究[J].南京社会科学,2019(6):26-33,58.
[10]胡苏云,王振.农村劳动力的外出就业及其对农户的影响——安徽省霍山县与山东省牟平县的比较分析[J].中国农村经济,2004(1):34-40.
[11]樊士德,江克忠.中国农村家庭劳动力流动的减贫效应研究——基于CFPS数据的微观证据[J].中国人口科学,2016(5):26-34.
[12]王金营,魏慧静.农村贫困地区家庭成员受教育程度、外出状况与家庭经济发展——基于河北省燕山-太行山、黑龙港流域的调查[J].人口学刊,2015(5):42-51.
[13]Rizwan UI Haq,AjmalJahangeer,Azkar Ahmad.Out-migration in Rural Pakistan:Does Household Poverty Status Matter[J].The Pakistan Development Review,2015(4):315-331.
[14]韩佳丽,王志章,王汉杰.贫困地区劳动力流动对农户多维贫困的影响[J].经济科学,2017(6):87-101.
[15]车四方,谢家智,姚领.社会资本、农村劳动力流动与农户家庭多维贫困[J].西南大学学报(社会科学版),2019(3):61-73.
[16]杜鹏,李一男,王澎湖.流动人口外出对其家庭的影响[J].人口学刊,2007(1):3-9.
[17]牛建林.农村地区外出务工潮对义务教育阶段辍学的影响[J].中国人口科学,2012(4):103-110.
[18]张立冬.中国农村贫困代际传递实证研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2013(6):45-50.
[19]连玉君,黎文素,黄必红.子女外出务工对父母健康和生活满意度影响研究[J].经济学(季刊),2014(1):185-202.
[20]孙文凯,王乙杰.父母外出务工对留守儿童健康的影响——基于微观面板数据的再考察[J].经济学(季刊),2016(3):963-988.
[21]舒玢玢,同钰莹.成年子女外出务工对农村老年人健康的影响——再论“父母在,不远游”[J].人口研究》,2017(2):42-56.
[22]张昭,杨澄宇,袁强.收入导向型多维贫困测度的稳健性与敏感性[J].劳动经济研究,2016(5):3-23.
[23]张昭,杨澄宇,袁强.“收入导向型”多维贫困的识别与流动性研究——基于CFPS调查数据农村子样本的考察[J].经济理论与经济管理,2017(2):98-112.
[24]Alkire,Sabina,Foster J.Counting and Multidimensional Poverty Measurement[J].Journal of Public Economics.2011(8):476-487.
[25]邹薇,方迎风.关于中国贫困的动态多维度研究[J].中国人口科学,2011(6):49-59.
[26]Vijaya,Ramya M.,Lahoti,R,Swaminathan,H.Moving from the Household to the Individual:Multidimensional Poverty Analysis[J].World Development,2014(3):70-81.
[27]王春超,叶琴.中国农民工多维贫困的演进——基于收入与教育维度的考察[J].经济研究,2014(12):159-174.
[28]杨龙,汪三贵.贫困地区农户的多维贫困测量与分解——基于2010年中国农村贫困监测的农户数据[J].人口学刊,2015(2):15-25.
[29]郭熙保,周强.长期多维贫困、不平等与致贫因素[J].经济研究,2016(6):143-156.
[30]方迎风.中国贫困的多维测度[J].当代经济科学,2012(4):7-15.
[31]张全红,周强.中国多维贫困的测度及分解:1989-2009年[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2014(6):88-101.
[32]王保雪.基于DEMATEL-熵权法云南多维贫困指标的权重研究[D].昆明:云南财经大学,2014.
[33]谢家智,车四方.农村家庭多维贫困测度与分析[J].统计研究,2017(9):44-55.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2020-01-03
基金项目:国家社会科学基金一般项目“精准扶贫背景下中国劳动力流动的减贫效应与政策研究”(18BJL124); 江苏高校“青蓝工程”优秀教学团队“经济学专业TMPP教学团队”(苏教师函〔2020〕10号); 江苏高校一流本科专业(经济学专业); 南京审计大学预研基金项目“劳动力流动、新型城镇化与区域协调发展研究”(20ZDYY001)
作者简介:樊士德(1979-),男,江苏连云港人,博士,教授,研究方向为劳动力流动、贫困与地区差距。
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-08-10