[1]彭明旭,廖 桂,高 璐.南昌发展现状、潜力及其政策建议——基于中部省会城市比较视角[J].金融教育研究,2018,(04):53-63.
 PENG Mingxu,LIAO Gui,GAO Lu.Development Status,Potential and Policy Recommendations in Nanchang——Based on the Comparative Perspective of the Central Provincial Capital City[J].,2018,(04):53-63.
点击复制

南昌发展现状、潜力及其政策建议——基于中部省会城市比较视角()
分享到:

《金融教育研究》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2018年04期
页码:
53-63
栏目:
出版日期:
2018-08-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Development Status,Potential and Policy Recommendations in Nanchang——Based on the Comparative Perspective of the Central Provincial Capital City
文章编号:
2095-0098(2018)04-0053-11
作者:
彭明旭 廖 桂 高 璐
江西师范大学 财政金融学院,江西 南昌 330022
Author(s):
PENG Mingxu LIAO Gui GAO Lu
School of Finance,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang,Jiangxi 330022,China
关键词:
南昌 发展现状 发展潜力 政策建议
Keywords:
Nanchang development status development potential policy suggestions
分类号:
F291.1
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
从发展现状和发展潜力两方面,把南昌同中部其他三个省会城市武汉、长沙、合肥进行比较分析。发展现状主要包括经济总量(量)、经济发展速度(速)、省会城市在本省中GDP的比重(度)、旧经济(旧)、新兴经济(新)、增长质量(质)等六方面。发展潜力主要包括人口、教育科技、交通、对外联系、国家战略定位等五方面。研究结果表明:相比于其他三个省会城市,南昌在过去的十五年发展并不理想,而未来的发展潜力也比较弱。南昌必须采取措施,才能赶超上来。
Abstract:
From the two aspects of development status and development potential,Nanchang is compared with Wuhan,Changsha and Hefei,three other provincial capitals in central China.The development status mainly includes six aspects,such as the total amount of economy(amount),the speed of economic development(speed),the GDP proportion of the capital city in the province(degree),the old economy(old),the new economy(new),the quality of growth(quality)and so on.The development potential mainly includes five aspects:population,education and science technology,transportation,external relations,and national strategic positioning.The results show that:compared with the other three provincial capitals,Nanchang has not developed well in the past fifteen years,and its future development potential is relatively weak.Nanchang must take measures to catch up.

参考文献/References:

[1]吕拉昌,黄茹,比较城市主义的复兴与比较的视角[J].地域研究与开发,2014,33(2):1-5.
[2]Ng M.K.,Hills P.,World Cities or Great Cities?A Comparative Study of Five Asian Metropolises[J].Cities,2003,20(3):151-165.
[3]Nijman J.Introduction-Comparative Urbanism[J].UrbanGeography,2007,28(1):1-6.
[4]Dick H.W.,Rimmer P.j.,Beyond the Third World City:The New Urban Geography of South-east Asia[J].Urban Studies,1998,35(12):2303-2321.
[5]Derudder B,Witlox F,Taylor P.J,United States Cities in the World City Network:Comparing Their Positions Using Global Origins and Destinations of Airline Passengers[J].Urban Geography,2007,28(1):74-91.
[6]Chandler T.Four Thousand Years of Urban Growth[M].Lewiston NY:Edwin Mellen Press,1987.
[7]Kloosterman R C,Lambregts B.Clustering of Economic Activities in Polycentric Urban Region:The Case of the Randstad[J].Urban Studies,2001,38(4):717-732.
[8]王安平.产业一体化的内涵与途径——以南昌九江地区工业一体化为实证[J].经济地理,2014,34(9):93-98.
[9]赵海.人口城镇化的现实困境与路径选择--基于江西省南昌县的调查[J].宏观经济研究,2013(10):6-10.
[10]朱丽萌.鄱阳湖生态经济区大南昌城市群与产业集群空间耦合构想[J].江西财经大学学报,2010(5):5-9.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2018-05-05
基金项目:国家社科重大招标项目“‘互联网+’驱动传统产业创新发展路径及模式研究”(16ZDA014);
国家社科基金项目“城乡统筹下的小城镇公共品供给结构问题研究”(13CJY114)
作者简介:彭明旭(1979-),男,福建泉州人,在站博士后,讲师,研究方向为经济学;
廖 桂(1996-),女,江西宜春人,硕士研究生,研究方向为发展经济学;
高 璐(1997-),女,江西九江人,硕士研究生,研究方向为发展经济学。
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-08-20